Built for General Contractors

AI Plan Checking for Contractors

Catch conflicts and code issues before they hit the field. Review full plan sets in days, not weeks.

Fewer RFIs & change orders
Minutes turnaround
Protects your margins

5+ issues or full refund · Results in hours · Files encrypted & deleted on request

Trusted by 500+ companies including

187K+ issues caught$50K+ avg value found per project

Architects · Engineers · GCs · Developers · Owner's Reps · Plan Checkers · Insurance

ProStruct Engineering
Solorio, Inc.
CBA Architects
Structural Workshop
Existing Building
Kirksey Architecture
Cagley
AP Fabrications
Columbia Construction
BDCL Architects
Structural Forensic Experts
DGen Energy
X Engineering
Concrete Frame
Becker Frondorf
Arrowstreet
Kovacs Consulting Group
Tierney LLC
Tricar
Flint Engineering
Eden Housing
Fyffe Construction
Well Done 1 Kit Homes
ProStruct Engineering
Solorio, Inc.
CBA Architects
Structural Workshop
Existing Building
Kirksey Architecture
Cagley
AP Fabrications
Columbia Construction
BDCL Architects
Structural Forensic Experts
DGen Energy
X Engineering
Concrete Frame
Becker Frondorf
Arrowstreet
Kovacs Consulting Group
Tierney LLC
Tricar
Flint Engineering
Eden Housing
Fyffe Construction
Well Done 1 Kit Homes
Lennar
SOM
IMEG Corp
Martin/Martin
Huckabee
Molba Construction
Nexstar Homes
Sciensus USA
AdobeInc
IDA Structural Engineer
Loma Architecture
PE-SE
Bradford Building
TDG Inc
Unum Collab
Sound Structures
Lennar
SOM
IMEG Corp
Martin/Martin
Huckabee
Molba Construction
Nexstar Homes
Sciensus USA
AdobeInc
IDA Structural Engineer
Loma Architecture
PE-SE
Bradford Building
TDG Inc
Unum Collab
Sound Structures
CSHQA
SpecSF
TNP Inc
Centerline
Wadman
Dalton Architects
Opening Tech
Viking Construction
Lead LLC
J. Fisher & Co
Miller Remick
ADCI Design
Arcca GP
Seth Structural
Zeltmatcher
WRC Consulting
LCG MEP
Hergonsa
McKinley Delivers
SFLA
Hero X Airdomes
ALF FL
Get Provision
Concept AZ
Lamontara
CSHQA
SpecSF
TNP Inc
Centerline
Wadman
Dalton Architects
Opening Tech
Viking Construction
Lead LLC
J. Fisher & Co
Miller Remick
ADCI Design
Arcca GP
Seth Structural
Zeltmatcher
WRC Consulting
LCG MEP
Hergonsa
McKinley Delivers
SFLA
Hero X Airdomes
ALF FL
Get Provision
Concept AZ
Lamontara

Average: 127 issues found per project

The Problem for General Contractors

Construction coordination issues cost you money

5-10%

of project budget lost to rework from drawing errors

40-60

average RFIs per project from coordination gaps

$5,000+

average cost per RFI when delays are factored in

100-200

issues InspectMind catches per project on average

Sources: FMI Research, Autodesk/Dodge Construction Data, InspectMind analysis of 500+ projects

Why GCs Use InspectMind

Catch issues before they become expensive problems.

Protect Your Margins

Rework costs 5-10% of project budgets. Catch issues before they erode your profit.

Catch Issues Early

Find conflicts, mismatches, and code violations before they become change orders.

Fewer RFIs

Identify issues that would generate RFIs before breaking ground.

Results in Hours

Get a prioritized issue list in hours. No waiting weeks for consultant review.

When to Use It

From bidding to closeout—stay ahead of issues at every stage.

Win More Bids

Walk into owner interviews showing: 'We found 300 issues on your drawings—here's what we already understand.' Demonstrate document mastery that justifies your pricing and builds trust before you're even selected.

  • Stand out from competition
  • Justify your pricing
  • Build owner trust

Bidding & Preconstruction

Review IFC sets before bidding. Identify risks, scope gaps, and coordination issues that affect your estimate. Price with confidence, not surprises.

  • Accurate bids
  • Risk identification
  • Scope clarity

Start of Construction

Review before mobilization. Catch issues that would cause delays and rework. Start clean, not chasing problems.

  • Prevent field conflicts
  • Reduce RFIs
  • Smooth start

Revision Review

Review ASIs and revised drawings. Identify changes and new conflicts quickly. Don't let addenda slip through.

  • Change tracking
  • Impact analysis
  • Fast turnaround

"InspectMind helped us catch real meaningful issues. Using it early in the process is going to absolutely help out in the field. For temperature-controlled facilities, this kind of AI-driven QA/QC is incredibly valuable. It immediately caught real issues like wood vs HDPE blocking conflicts and specs vs drawings mismatches."

A

Aaron Bass

Director of Construction, Cold Summit Development

Simple, transparent pricing

Pay per check. All disciplines included. No per-user fees.

500+ sheets at $1/sheet drawings, $0.25/page specs. Full pricing →

Running 10+ checks/month?

What the AI Does (and Doesn't Do)

Setting the right expectations

What InspectMind Does

  • AI-powered design review and compliance checking
  • Cross-discipline coordination issue detection
  • Code non-compliance identification (IBC, ADA, fire/life safety)
  • Missing or inconsistent information flagging
  • Constructability risk detection
  • Spec vs drawing conflict identification
  • Structured comment tracker with severity ratings
  • Revision tracking—verifies if previous comments are resolved

What InspectMind Doesn't Do

  • Generate design—AI reviews only, design responsibility stays with consultant of record
  • Replace stamped engineering calculations
  • Provide final code approval (use alongside AHJ review)
  • Replace your QA/QC team—it augments, not replaces

For calculations: We check consistency between calculations and drawings, flag unrealistic assumptions, and identify sizing inconsistencies—but don't replace engineering calcs.

ROI Calculator

See what one check saves you

Based on real data from 2,800+ projects and 58,000+ issues found.

Your project details

$5.0M
$500K$100M
200
202,000

InspectMind cost

Up to 250 sheets · flat

$250

InspectMind

$250

One RFI

$3,500

One rework

$15,000

Estimated savings

Issues found

~140

20 Critical74 High46 Medium

Critical issues caught

Code violations, structural conflicts, rework avoided

$120K

High-severity issues caught

RFIs prevented, coordination clashes resolved

$52K

Medium issues caught

Drawing gaps, specification clarifications

$7K
Total estimated savings$179K
Return on investment

$250 investment → $179K saved

715x

One critical issue caught pays for 60 checks. Even the most skeptical estimate shows massive ROI — because catching problems in design costs 10–100x less than fixing them in the field.

Start free first check

5+ issues found or full refund guaranteed

How we calculate savings

Issue count: ~70 issues per 100 drawing sheets — our real average across 2,800+ completed projects.

Severity split: 14% Critical / 53% High / 33% Medium — from 58,000+ real issues exported from our production database.

Savings model: We estimate what fraction of issues at each severity would have caused a costly downstream problem (RFI, change order, rework) if not caught during design review. We use conservative "escape rates" — 40% for Critical, 20% for High, 10% for Medium — well below industry rework benchmarks (CII: 5–10% of project value).

Cost per escaped issue: Critical $10K–$50K (scales with project value — rework on a $50M project costs more than on a $1M project), High $2K–$8K (RFI + delay), Medium $1.5K (minor rework). Based on CII, FMI, and Navigant construction industry research.

Frequently Asked Questions

After plans go to the field

Daily logs and punch lists, drafted in minutes

Walk the site, dictate findings, snap photos. Field Reports drafts daily logs and punch lists in your firm's template — pushes to Procore and Smartsheet.

Explore Daily Logs

Ready to Catch Issues Before They Cost You?

Upload drawings and get issues with evidence in hours. Start with a free first check.

Not sure? Run it on a completed project you already know — see what we catch.

Start free first check

5+ issues guaranteed or full refund · No sales call required