Construction drawing review and document QA — evidence-backed findings in hours, then recheck every revision.
Trusted by 2,000+ customer accounts including
Architects · Engineers · GCs · Developers · Owner's Reps · Plan Checkers · Insurance
Start with $100 credit - then see transparent pricing below
60 sheets ($60) → $100 tier + 2 codes ($30)
Evidence-linked report · Often ~1–2 hrs
Exact price shown before you run. Large projects owe the difference after the $100 credit.
For high-volume teams: Running 250+ sheets a month? Volume discounts and monthly plans available.
Real Output From Real Projects
On a typical commercial project, InspectMind flags 259+ issues across all disciplines. One issue found pays for the whole check.
Learn how InspectMind supports construction drawing review and a consistent construction document QA/QC process.
47
Critical
89
High
78
Medium
45
Low
You don't have to trust the AI, not one bit.
Every finding shows the exact drawing snippet and code reference. You verify in seconds. This isn't ChatGPT guessing at codes; it's purpose-built for construction plan review.
Results in hours•Starts at $50•Evidence for every finding•Cheaper than one RFI•Money-back guarantee
Inside the review
Real document discrepancies, the reason they need attention, and a concrete next step for the design team.
1,400+
completed project records
1,400+
completed checks
155K+
potential findings retained
294K+
recorded pages across checks
Verified 2026-09-16. Pages are a recorded minimum; findings need professional review. Definitions and methodology
Commercial · Anonymized review
Compare architectural assemblies, shutdown planning, and access-control sequences before procuring laboratory building systems.
Read the findingsCommercial · Anonymized review
Check that structural load criteria and building elevations agree before framing and truss design proceed.
Read the findingsEducation · Anonymized review
Compare school equipment schedules with controls specifications and the document index before coordinating MEP installation.
Read the findingsInfrastructure · Anonymized review
Reconcile available fault current, equipment ratings, and motor voltages across electrical diagrams before equipment release.
Read the findingsData Center · Anonymized review
Compare suppression sequences, detector placement, and grounding details against the project specifications.
Read the findingsResidential · Anonymized review
Check that architectural plans, sections, ventilation schedules, and wet-area details describe the same renovation scope.
Read the findingsReview the evidence, check the price, then try your own set. Eligible work emails receive a $100 first-check credit.
Review activity includes 1,400+ completed checks and 155,000+ potential findings retained. Savings below are modeled assumptions, not measured customer outcomes.
InspectMind cost
Up to 250 sheets · flat
InspectMind
$250
One RFI
$3,500
One rework
$15,000
~85
Critical issues caught
Code violations, structural conflicts, rework avoided
High-severity issues caught
RFIs prevented, coordination clashes resolved
Medium issues caught
Drawing gaps, specification clarifications
$250 investment → $108K modeled savings
431x
A confirmed issue that prevents downstream work can justify a review. Actual value depends on which findings require action and what the team corrects. This model does not predict or guarantee your savings.
5+ issues found or full refund guaranteed
Issue count: ~43 potential findings per 100 recorded pages in completed checks with page counts. Document types and review scopes vary.
Severity split: 14% Critical / 53% High / 33% Medium is the illustrative mix used in this model. It is not a measured accuracy or confirmed-defect rate.
Savings model: We estimate what fraction of issues at each severity would have caused a costly downstream problem (RFI, change order, rework) if not caught during design review. The assumed escape rates are 40% for Critical, 20% for High, and 10% for Medium. These are modeling assumptions, not observed outcomes.
Cost per escaped issue: Critical $10K–$50K (scales with project value — rework on a $50M project costs more than on a $1M project), High $2K–$8K (RFI + delay), Medium $1.5K (minor rework). These are scenario inputs, not customer-verified savings.
No training. No setup. No sales call. Most teams start with one project to see the results.
Drawings, specs, reports — plus your internal QA checklists, standards, and local ordinances. We check against everything you upload.
Cross-references all disciplines against codes, specs, and your internal standards. Catches constructability issues too.
Prioritized by severity with page refs and code citations. Evidence for every single finding.
Common questions, answered upfront
Starts at $50 · 5+ issues or full refund
See real results in our webinars, then try it on your own project.
Real results from real projects
"This is absolutely a no-brainer."
· Martin, CBA Architects
"Nobody would catch that. No matter how many days you have, nobody is going to go into that level of detail."
· Jen Wooles, Columbia Construction
"That one thing alone pays for the whole thing many times over."
· Ben Simcik, AEC
"Having another check through AI on top of our normal process has already been helpful."
· Brandon Compton, Design/Construction
"InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project: conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review."
Aaron Bass
Director of Construction, Cold Summit Development
$2M+ in rework prevented
"This is absolutely a no-brainer."
Martin
Architect, CBA Architects
Validated; no-brainer decision
"Nobody would catch that. No matter how many days you have, nobody is going to go into that level of detail."
Jen Wooles
Project Manager, Columbia Construction
Level of detail no one else would catch
"We were really happy with what popped out once our engineer reviewed it."
Matthew Jahnke
Engineer, Bluestone MEP
Team happy with results
"It looks like an awesome product, like another pair of eyes checking everything."
Ben Simcik
Design/Construction, AEC
Another pair of eyes
"I could say yours is probably the first I've seen in the market that anybody can actually use."
Francis Kunle Adeleke
Professional, AEC
First tool anybody can actually use
"Your software looks pretty awesome."
James Morrison
Design/Construction, Design & Build
Software stands out
"It's exciting, and this is definitely what we were looking for."
Nikol Hall
Team Lead, Concrete Frame
Exactly what they were looking for
"We used to spend 40+ hours on plan review. Now I upload the drawings, and get back a complete issue report that catches code violations I would have missed. It's a no-brainer."
Julio
Owner, Pesco Engineering
40+ hours saved per project
Purpose-built for construction, not ChatGPT or general AI. AI plan check vs ChatGPT
Understands drawings, not just text
Reads diagrams, details, riser diagrams, not just text matching
Multi-discipline + cross-discipline
Arch, Struct, MEP, Civil, Fire: catches spec vs drawing conflicts
Code + constructability
IBC, CBC, ADA, local codes + unbuildable connections, undersized pipes
Finds 100-500+ issues per project
Other tools find 8. We find 200+ on the same job.
Evidence for every finding
Drawing snippet + code ref: you verify in seconds, no blind trust
Self-serve, no sales call
6 min from signup to running a check
No per-user fees
Pay per check, share with your entire team
Scanned & hand-drawn PDFs
Works with any PDF: scanned, hand-drawn, or native digital
Money-back guarantee
5+ issues or full refund
Not sure yet?
Run it on a completed project you already know
Most teams validate by uploading a project where they already know the issues. See what we catch — then roll out across every job.
Start with $100 creditArchitects, engineers, contractors, developers, owner's reps, plan checkers, from solo firms to Fortune 500.
AI findings can be wrong or incomplete. Review the available drawing, specification, or code evidence with your team before deciding what needs action.
InspectMind supports your team's review. Its findings do not certify compliance or replace professional judgment. We cannot promise that using AI removes liability.
AI can miss issues. Check the report's review coverage and evidence limitations, and have your team assess any gaps. A clean result does not establish compliance.
Our Trust Center explains how we handle documents, protect access, and respond to deletion requests. Review those details before uploading confidential project information.
Read the Trust CenterHere are the questions teams ask before they stop losing money to missed issues.
No sales call. No commitment. First $100 covered for eligible work emails — exact price shown before you run. Upload PDFs and get hundreds of issues with evidence in hours. One issue found pays for the whole check. 5+ issues or full refund.
5+ issues or full refund · No demo required
Sample report: 282 issues found|Pricing after first check
155,000+ customer-visible issues across 2,000+ customer accounts
Aakash has dedicated his work and ownership in InspectMind to God. His faith calls him to love God, serve our neighbors, and build with integrity.
That means working to make excellent construction and engineering tools affordable and accessible, not reserved only for large enterprises.
Love God. Build with God. Build for God.
These are Aakash’s personal convictions and guide how he leads and hopes to build InspectMind.
