InspectMind AI logo InspectMind

AI plan checks catch mistakes before they get built

Construction drawing review and document QA — evidence-backed findings in hours, then recheck every revision.

First $100 covered · Price before run · 5+ issues or full refund · Files deleted on request

Trusted by 2,000+ customer accounts including

227K+ customer-visible issues$50K+ avg value found per project

Architects · Engineers · GCs · Developers · Owner's Reps · Plan Checkers · Insurance

PE
SI
CA
SW
EB
KA
CA
AF
CC
BA
SF
DE
XE
CF
BF
AR
KC
TL
TR
FE
EH
FC
WD
PE
SI
CA
SW
EB
KA
CA
AF
CC
BA
SF
DE
XE
CF
BF
AR
KC
TL
TR
FE
EH
FC
WD
LE
IC
MA
MC
NH
SU
AD
IS
LA
PE
BB
TI
UC
SS
LE
IC
MA
MC
NH
SU
AD
IS
LA
PE
BB
TI
UC
SS
CS
SP
TI
CE
WA
DA
OT
VC
LL
JF
MR
AD
AG
SS
ZE
WC
LM
HE
MD
SF
HX
AF
GP
CA
LA
CS
SP
TI
CE
WA
DA
OT
VC
LL
JF
MR
AD
AG
SS
ZE
WC
LM
HE
MD
SF
HX
AF
GP
CA
LA

Start with $100 credit - then see transparent pricing below

Your price for this setMoney-back guarantee
$130

60 sheets ($60) → $100 tier + 2 codes ($30)

~70 issues typical · ~20 min – 1 hr

Drawing sheets
$1 per sheet · type or hold +/−
Codes to check
$0.25 per sheet per code
Spec / report pages
$0.25 per page · type or hold +/−
Start with $100 credit

Exact price shown before you run. Large projects owe the difference after the $100 credit.

Full pricing details →

For high-volume teams: Running 250+ sheets a month? Volume discounts and monthly plans available.

Real Output From Real Projects

What AI plan check finds in construction drawing review

On a typical commercial project, InspectMind flags 259+ issues across all disciplines. One issue found pays for the whole check.

Learn how InspectMind supports construction drawing review and a consistent construction document QA/QC process.

47

Critical

  • Fastener can’t reach; connection unbuildable
  • Allowable area calculation off by 80K sqft
  • Fire rated corridor continuity interrupted
  • Septic tank 33% undersized vs code

89

High

  • Spec vs drawing contradiction (hold-down type)
  • Pipe undersized for actual load
  • Egress width below code minimum

78

Medium

  • Drawing vs spec dimension mismatch
  • Header schedule contradicts framing notes
  • Ramp slope exceeds ADA maximum

45

Low

  • Placeholder text not updated (XXXXX)
  • Detail reference points to wrong sheet
  • Note inconsistency across pages

Common issues we catch

Spec says one thing, drawing says another (e.g. ATS vs conventional hold-down)
Constructability: fastener length won’t reach; connection can’t be built
Pipe diameter undersized for actual load (e.g. 5 AC units on a single-unit pipe)
Septic tank 33% undersized vs code calculation
Placeholder text left in details (XXXXX instead of model number)
Allowable area calculation wrong by 80,000 sq ft (4 vs 5 stories)
Civil: outlet elevation higher than inlet; uphill flow condition
Violations of your uploaded QA checklists, internal standards, or local ordinances

You don't have to trust the AI, not one bit.

Every finding shows the exact drawing snippet and code reference. You verify in seconds. This isn't ChatGPT guessing at codes; it's purpose-built for construction plan review.

Run this on your project

Results in hoursStarts at $50Evidence for every findingCheaper than one RFIMoney-back guarantee

The math is simple

Industry data shows fixing issues during design costs 10x less than fixing them in the field. We help you find those issues in Often ~1 hr to same day.

  • $3M margin loss avoided: slab spec error caught before construction
  • Documented issue log: backup for change order negotiations with owners
  • Win more bids: prove deeper due diligence than competitors
  • Costs less than 1 hour of billing rate: a typical check is $50-$500 vs thousands in RFIs and change orders
  • 100% automated, zero human: upload PDFs, get results in hours, not weeks
  • 5+ issues or full refund
  • Results in hours
  • No demo required

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

10x
cheaper to fix in design
than in the field*

Real result

350 issues caught → only 5 pages of city comments

An architecture & engineering firm ran our AI on an 11,000 sqft ground-up commercial building before permit submission. We found 350 issues, including a septic tank 33% undersized. They fixed everything. The city came back with just 5 pages of comments on the first submission. For context, you typically get more than that on a home remodel in California.

AI caught 90% of issues before the city even looked at it. Permitting went through in days, not months.

ROI Calculator

See what one check saves you

Based on real data from 1,300+ completed checks and 227,181+ customer-visible issues caught.

Your project details

$5.0M
$500K$100M
200
202,000
1351025

InspectMind cost

Up to 250 sheets · flat

$250

InspectMind

$250

One RFI

$3,500

One rework

$15,000

Estimated savings

Per projectAnnual (5 projects)
Issues found

~140

20 Critical74 High46 Medium

Critical issues caught

Code violations, structural conflicts, rework avoided

$120K

High-severity issues caught

RFIs prevented, coordination clashes resolved

$52K

Medium issues caught

Drawing gaps, specification clarifications

$7K
Total estimated savings$179K
Return on investment

$250 investment → $179K saved

715x

One critical issue caught pays for 60 checks. Even the most skeptical estimate shows massive ROI — because catching problems in design costs 10–100x less than fixing them in the field.

Start with $100 credit

5+ issues found or full refund guaranteed

How we calculate savings

Issue count: ~70 customer-visible issues per 100 paid pages — our real average across completed checks.

Severity split: 14% Critical / 53% High / 33% Medium — from 58,000+ historical exported issues exported from our production database.

Savings model: We estimate what fraction of issues at each severity would have caused a costly downstream problem (RFI, change order, rework) if not caught during design review. We use conservative "escape rates" — 40% for Critical, 20% for High, 10% for Medium — well below industry rework benchmarks (CII: 5–10% of project value).

Cost per escaped issue: Critical $10K–$50K (scales with project value — rework on a $50M project costs more than on a $1M project), High $2K–$8K (RFI + delay), Medium $1.5K (minor rework). Based on CII, FMI, and Navigant construction industry research.

How it works

How AI plan check works in three steps

No training. No setup. No sales call. Most teams start with one project to see the results.

Watch the 2-min interactive demo
01

Upload all project PDFs

Drawings, specs, reports — plus your internal QA checklists, standards, and local ordinances. We check against everything you upload.

  • Architectural, Structural, MEP, Civil
  • Specs, codes, geotechnical reports
  • Your internal QA checklists & standards
  • Local ordinances & custom requirements
  • Scanned PDFs supported
02

AI checks everything

Cross-references all disciplines against codes, specs, and your internal standards. Catches constructability issues too.

  • IBC, CBC, ADA, fire codes, state & local
  • Cross-discipline coordination
  • Spec vs drawing conflicts
  • Constructability & unbuildable connections
  • Understands diagrams, not just text
03

Get your issue list

Prioritized by severity with page refs and code citations. Evidence for every single finding.

  • Critical → Low severity ranking
  • Export to Excel or Procore
  • One-click RFI PDF per issue
  • Drawing snippet + code ref evidence
  • Share with team — no per-user charge

Common questions, answered upfront

TurnaroundSmall checks often ~1 hr · 100–500 pages a few hours · 500+ same day
Any stage30%, 60%, 90%, 100% — the earlier you catch it, the cheaper to fix
Scanned PDFsYes. Scanned, hand-drawn, and native digital all work
DisciplinesArch, Struct, MEP, Civil, Fire, Landscape. Shop drawings & submittals
SharingNo per-user fees. Share with your entire team, consultants, anyone
PaymentCredit card online. Invoice / PO / ACH for enterprise
Upload Plans — Get ResultsSee the 2-min demo first

Starts at $50 · 5+ issues or full refund

What customers say

Real results from real projects

"This is absolutely a no-brainer."

· Martin, CBA Architects

"Nobody would catch that. No matter how many days you have, nobody is going to go into that level of detail."

· Jen Wooles, Columbia Construction

"That one thing alone pays for the whole thing many times over."

· Ben Simcik, AEC

"Having another check through AI on top of our normal process has already been helpful."

· Brandon Compton, Design/Construction

"InspectMind caught 47 critical issues on our cold storage project: conflicts that would have cost us millions in field rework. It paid for itself on the first review."

Aaron Bass

Director of Construction, Cold Summit Development

$2M+ in rework prevented

"This is absolutely a no-brainer."

M

Martin

Architect, CBA Architects

Validated; no-brainer decision

"Nobody would catch that. No matter how many days you have, nobody is going to go into that level of detail."

J

Jen Wooles

Project Manager, Columbia Construction

Level of detail no one else would catch

"We were really happy with what popped out once our engineer reviewed it."

M

Matthew Jahnke

Engineer, Bluestone MEP

Team happy with results

"It looks like an awesome product, like another pair of eyes checking everything."

B

Ben Simcik

Design/Construction, AEC

Another pair of eyes

"I could say yours is probably the first I've seen in the market that anybody can actually use."

F

Francis Kunle Adeleke

Professional, AEC

First tool anybody can actually use

"Your software looks pretty awesome."

J

James Morrison

Design/Construction, Design & Build

Software stands out

"It's exciting, and this is definitely what we were looking for."

N

Nikol Hall

Team Lead, Concrete Frame

Exactly what they were looking for

"We used to spend 40+ hours on plan review. Now I upload the drawings, and get back a complete issue report that catches code violations I would have missed. It's a no-brainer."

Julio

Owner, Pesco Engineering

40+ hours saved per project

Why teams choose InspectMind

Purpose-built for construction, not ChatGPT or general AI. AI plan check vs ChatGPT

Feature
InspectMind
Typical AI Plan Check

Understands drawings, not just text

Reads diagrams, details, riser diagrams, not just text matching

Multi-discipline + cross-discipline

Arch, Struct, MEP, Civil, Fire: catches spec vs drawing conflicts

Code + constructability

IBC, CBC, ADA, local codes + unbuildable connections, undersized pipes

Finds 100-500+ issues per project

Other tools find 8. We find 200+ on the same job.

Evidence for every finding

Drawing snippet + code ref: you verify in seconds, no blind trust

Self-serve, no sales call

6 min from signup to running a check

No per-user fees

Pay per check, share with your entire team

Scanned & hand-drawn PDFs

Works with any PDF: scanned, hand-drawn, or native digital

Money-back guarantee

5+ issues or full refund

Not sure yet?

Run it on a completed project you already know

Most teams validate by uploading a project where they already know the issues. See what we catch — then roll out across every job.

Start with $100 credit

Built for AEC professionals: we understand the concerns

Architects, engineers, contractors, developers, owner's reps, plan checkers, from solo firms to Fortune 500.

What about false positives?

Every issue includes the exact drawing snippet and code reference. You verify in seconds. Average accuracy: 85-90%.

Does this create liability?

No. AI-assisted review: you decide what's actionable. Clear disclaimers. Design responsibility stays with your team.

What if it misses something?

Even the best firms miss issues. We find hundreds more after their review. It's an extra pair of eyes, not a replacement.

What about data privacy?

Hosted on secure AWS with bank-level encryption. Data segregated between customers. Request deletion anytime.

Still on the fence?

Here are the questions teams ask before they stop losing money to missed issues.

What counts as a 'check'? What am I paying for?

What if you don't find any issues on my project?

Are re-checks extra? What if I fix issues and want to check again?

Can I buy without a phone call?

How accurate is the AI? What's the false positive rate?

Is my project data secure and confidential?

Does this replace licensed engineering review?

Can I use my local building codes or ordinances?

What about addenda or revised sets?

Do you support scanned PDFs?

Who do I contact if I need help?

My set has duplicate drawings (e.g. same civil set for each building). Does that affect pricing?

Want to see it in action? Watch the full ASCE webinar or NCSEA webinar, no call needed.
One issue caught pays for the service. 5+ issues or full refund.
First $100 covered

Try it on one project and see the results today

No sales call. No commitment. First $100 covered for eligible work emails — exact price shown before you run. Upload PDFs and get hundreds of issues with evidence in hours. One issue found pays for the whole check. 5+ issues or full refund.

  • 5+ issues or full refund
  • Results in hours
  • No demo required

5+ issues or full refund · No demo required

Sample report: 282 issues found|Pricing after first check

227,181+ customer-visible issues across 2,000+ customer accounts

Aakash’s Faith & Stewardship

Built for God. Built to serve.

Aakash has dedicated his work and ownership in InspectMind to God. His faith calls him to love God, serve our neighbors, and build with integrity.

That means working to make excellent construction and engineering tools affordable and accessible, not reserved only for large enterprises.

Love God. Build with God. Build for God.

These are Aakash’s personal convictions and guide how he leads and hopes to build InspectMind.

Read Aakash’s statement